CA pass percentages (2018-2025): how hard is each level?
CA has no rank-style cutoff - you clear by hitting 40 percent in every paper and 50 percent aggregate across the group. The ICAI all-India pass percentages indicate how steep each level is: indicative bands of roughly 20 to 30 percent at Foundation, 10 to 20 percent at Intermediate group-wise, and 5 to 15 percent at Final - all swinging session to session. This page shows the attempt-by-attempt trend, explains how ICAI publishes the all-India rank list, the AIR-1 phenomenon, and how to actually read the ICAI result format.
The numbers below are indicative all-India pass percentages per attempt (Both Groups, for Intermediate and Final). They fluctuate attempt-to-attempt; treat them as ranges, not guarantees.
What are the ICAI pass percentages by attempt?
| Attempt | Foundation | Inter (Both) | Final (Both) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 (May) | ~14% | ~12% | ~11% |
| 2024 (Nov) | ~13% | ~14% | ~13% |
| 2024 (May) | ~16% | ~11% | ~12% |
| 2023 (Nov) | ~28% | ~12% | ~9% |
| 2023 (May) | ~24% | ~13% | ~10% |
| 2022 (Nov) | ~21% | ~14% | ~12% |
| 2021 (Dec) | ~26% | ~16% | ~13% |
Ready to test where you stand against the pass band? Take a free CA mock and see the 40 / 50 pass verdict applied to your scorecard in 3 hours.
What do these pass percentages mean for your CA prep?
- Foundation (~13-28%): Looks easier than Inter/Final, but the low end (~13%) reflects under-prepared candidates who treat it as a formality. With consistent prep + mocks, the effective pass probability is far higher.
- Intermediate (~11-16% both groups): The genuine filter. Taxation and Advanced Accounting are the usual group-droppers. Mock-test discipline matters most here.
- Final (~9-13% both groups): Hardest level. Financial Reporting, Direct Tax, and Indirect Tax carry the heaviest failure rates. Articleship experience helps the practical papers.
Want to know which papers will likely drag you below the bar? Take a free CA mock and the paper-wise scorecard will surface them paper by paper.
How does the 40 / 50 pass rule actually work?
You don't compete against other candidates for a rank - you compete against the paper. To clear a group: ≥ 40% in every paper of the group AND ≥ 50% aggregateacross that group's papers. A single sub-40 paper fails the entire group regardless of aggregate.
See the rule in action - take a free CA mock and the scorecard at the end will flag exactly which papers cleared the 40 percent floor and which dragged the group below 50.
Indicative pass-rate bands per level (hedged)
Pass percentages move attempt to attempt, and ICAI does not publish a target rate. What you can do is read the historical bands and the typical position within them. The numbers below are indicative ranges across multiple recent sessions - treat them as planning baselines, not predictions.
| Level / split | Indicative band | Drift direction |
|---|---|---|
| Foundation (all 4 papers) | ~20-30% | Lower under the New Scheme so far; varies session to session |
| Intermediate single group | ~15-25% | Typically higher than both-groups; group I vs II varies |
| Intermediate both groups together | ~10-20% | Tends to track the lower of the two single-group rates |
| Final single group | ~10-20% | Group I (Financial Reporting / Audit) usually harder |
| Final both groups together | ~5-15% | Single-digit territory in tougher sessions |
The bands above are indicative ranges only. Pass percentages depend on syllabus patches in force that session, paper difficulty, and the candidate pool composition (first-attempt versus re-attempt mix). A single attempt rarely matches the mid-point of the band - some sessions sit at the floor, some at the ceiling.
How does the ICAI all-India rank list work?
CA does not run a competitive cutoff, but ICAI does publish an All-India Rank (AIR) list of top performers at each level. The rank list is published alongside the result and is based purely on aggregate marks across the relevant set of papers.
What the rank list contains
- Top 50 ranks are published on the ICAI website at each of the three levels (Foundation, Intermediate, Final) for every attempt.
- Ties at the same total are assigned the same rank, and the next rank skips accordingly. A 12-way tie at second place is published with all twelve names at rank 2.
- Eligibility for the rank list: You must have appeared in all papers of the relevant level in a single attempt (Foundation 4-paper attempt; Intermediate both-groups; Final both-groups). A split-group attempt at Inter / Final does not qualify for ranking even if your aggregate would otherwise place you.
- No regional or state ranks - the rank list is national only. Performance in different exam centres is treated identically.
The AIR-1 phenomenon
The candidate at All-India Rank 1 at CA Final tends to attract the largest professional services job offers in any given placement season - well into the high-INR-lakhs-per-annum band in recent years, with some announcements crossing a crore for combined India plus overseas postings. The rank itself is a marketing asset for the candidate (the placement firms publicise it heavily) and for the institute (an aspirational data point for the next cohort).
Three patterns worth noting from recent AIR-1 profiles:
- First-attempt clears. AIR-1 candidates almost always clear Final in a single attempt with both groups together. Splitting groups disqualifies you from the rank list mathematically.
- Aggregate around 70 percent. The threshold to crack the top 50 has historically sat in the 60 to 75 percent aggregate band at Final - a meaningful jump above the 50 percent pass bar.
- Distributed across cities. AIR-1 has come from metros and non-metros across recent sessions; the distribution does not match what you might expect from the population of candidates.
How do you read the ICAI result format?
The ICAI result page on icai.nic.in shows your scorecard in a compact, paper-by-paper layout that is easy to misread under the post-result adrenaline. The standard format contains six fields per paper plus aggregate and verdict rows.
| Field | What it means |
|---|---|
| Paper name / number | The subject (e.g. Advanced Accounting at Inter Group I Paper 1) |
| Marks obtained | Total marks scored out of 100, after MCQ + subjective consolidation |
| 40 / 100 floor flag | Pass / fail indicator for the per-paper minimum (40) |
| Exemption flag | EX shown if you scored 60 or higher and the paper carries forward |
| Group aggregate | Total of the three group papers / 300 (Inter / Final) or four papers / 400 (Foundation) |
| Group verdict | P (pass), F (fail) or AB (absent in any paper, which fails the group) |
Common misreads
- Aggregate passes but verdict fails. Check every paper for the 40-floor flag - one paper at 38 fails the group even if the aggregate is 55 percent.
- EX without a P. Exemption flags on individual papers do not mean the group passed. The group verdict is the authoritative line. Exempted papers carry forward to the next three attempts independently.
- AB even on a single missed paper. An absent in any single paper of a group is recorded as AB at the group level, and is treated as a failed attempt for the exemption-validity clock.
Save the PDF result and check it cell by cell against your expected marks. The 30-day verification window starts ticking from the day of result publication, not the day you happen to look at the page.
Why May and September sessions can drift apart
Pass percentages within the same calendar year often move meaningfully between the May / June and November / December sittings. The drift is not arbitrary - it reflects the cohort mix and paper-setting differences across the two windows. A broad rule: November sittings tend to attract a higher share of re-attempt candidates carrying exemptions, which can pull single-group rates up; May sittings carry more first-attempt candidates fresh out of articleship completion.
Paper-setting differences also play a role. Direct Tax and Indirect Tax papers reset to the Finance Act applicable for that assessment year, so the May sitting after a major budget can run a tougher tax paper than the November sitting where candidates have had six more months to absorb the changes. Auditing standards updates land in a similar pattern. None of this is publicly explained by ICAI, but the historical band drift is consistent enough that planners should expect a 2 to 5 percentage point spread between adjacent sessions at the same level.
How attempt-clearing percentages are calculated
The pass percentage you see on icai.nic.in is calculated separately for each group at Intermediate and Final, and for the full four-paper bundle at Foundation. The denominator is the number of candidates who appeared in all papers of the relevant group or level - candidates marked absent in even one paper are excluded from the rate calculation, not failed by it.
- Foundation: One pass percentage for the full 4-paper level. A candidate is counted in the numerator only if they cleared the 40 / 50 rule across all four papers in that single attempt.
- Intermediate: Three rates - Group I only, Group II only, Both Groups. The both-groups rate is always lower than the geometric average of the two single-group rates, because it requires simultaneous clearance.
- Final: Same three rates as Intermediate. The both-groups Final rate is the most-cited difficulty signal for CA as a profession.
Why some papers fail more candidates than others
Within each level, certain papers consistently run higher fail rates across sessions. At Intermediate, Taxation and Advanced Accounting tend to be the group-droppers - syllabus volume plus rolling Finance Act updates make them harder to revise from cold. At Final, Direct Tax, Indirect Tax and Auditing Standards are the commonly-cited paper-drag culprits. The auditing paper in particular has a deceptive feel: questions sound conceptual but expect verbatim paragraph references from the Standards, which most candidates underestimate.
Category relaxations do not exist in CA
Unlike most Indian competitive exams, CA does not offer category-based relaxations on pass marks, age or attempts. The 40-per-paper and 50-aggregate bars are uniform across General, OBC, SC, ST and EWS candidates. Articleship stipend and ICAI scholarships sometimes have category-specific schemes, but the examination bar itself is pure-merit. This is consistent with the profession's self-regulation mandate - the qualification standard is set by ICAI, not by central reservation policy.
The Final clear-all-papers psychology
Clearing CA Final has a chain effect that the headline pass rate understates. A single-attempt both-groups clear opens the door to the ICAI placement programme in its premium tier (the orientation and interview cycle held twice a year), unlocks the firm-side counter-offer dynamic between Big 4 and large mid-tier firms, and changes the starting-stipend negotiation from a posted band to an individual one. Candidates who clear in their first attempt also tend to retain their articleship firm offers - the offer-letter language often makes the membership a hard condition.
Conversely, multiple Final attempts compress this window. Recruiters across the professional-services market do screen on attempts at the senior-associate level even years after qualification, and the candidate who clears Final on attempt three or four typically enters the job market through a different door than the first-attempt cohort. This is not fair, but it is consistent across the market - and worth knowing when you plan your Final attempt sequencing.
Free, authentic CA mocks
Want to be in the pass band? Practice the exact ICAI New Scheme format. Paper-wise mocks for Foundation, Intermediate, and Final with the 40/50 pass predictor.
Start a free mock →